Most people don’t know that the medical question of capacity and the legal question of capacity are not the same thing. Even a person who has dementia may be capable of making or changing their will. Each circumstance will be different and has to be assessed at the time of taking instructions from the client.
The legal test as to whether a person has the capacity to make a will comes from the old English case of Banks –v- Goodfellow (1870). In this case the deceased person was suffering from delusions; chiefly that his butcher was trying to kill him, even though this butcher had been dead for 11 years. In coming to its decision the court determined that for a person to have capacity to make a will there are five things which need to be established. The person making the Will:
(i) Understands the nature of a Will;
(ii) Understand what property they have;
(iii) Understands the people who would ordinarily be provided for under a will (the moral duty aspect);
(iv) Gives consideration to those people who would normally benefit under the will;
(v) Does not suffer delusions about any person who would expect to receive an entitlement under the will.
The result in the case was the deceased did have capacity to make the will in question because the delusions he suffered were not about a person who would have normally benefited under his will, i.e. people don’t usually leave part of their estate to their butcher.
Moving forward to the current tests for capacity, we see the case law has evolved. The legal position now suggests that just because a person suffers from dementia, it will not automatically mean they are unable to make a Will.
In general, lawyers must determine whether the person wishing to make or update a Will:
The complexity of the property and the complexity of the Will being drafted also determine the the level of understanding that the person making the Will must have. Sometimes a person will be referred to their medical practitioner for supporting evidence about their capacity, however it is still up to the lawyer to make a decision regarding legal ability to make or change a Will.
One NSW case dealing with this issue is Apice v Gutkovich – Estate of Abraham (No . 2)  . This case was about whether a 93 year old lady, Irene Abraham who had suffered from dementia for 5 years, had the capacity to make a will. At the time of making a will she was subject to Guardianship Tribunal Orders (orders that someone else should manage her financial and lifestyle decisions, because she was under disability).
Interestingly in the 15 months before her final will, the deceased made four other wills and codicils (an amendment to an existing will). On some of those occasions Ms Abraham’s doctor said she did not have the capacity to make any such will.
Nevertheless Ms Abrahams health improved somewhat and her doctor changed his opinion, while her solicitor was also of the opinion that she now had the capacity necessary to create a will. This evidence ultimately led to the court finding that she had capacity to make her will.
There are some very interesting parts of this case, which include finding that even though a person connot manage their day to day affairs and do not have capacity to make decision regarding their finances and lifestyle choice, they can still make a will.
Rachel Carter is the Principal Solicitor of Carter O’Neill Legal and has acted in many cases where the issue of whether a person has capacity to make a will has arisen.
Please contact Rachel Carter on 02 9151 7339 if you have an enquiry on capacity or making a Will.